Wednesday, October 24, 2012

YOU KNOW ME ! : Dj Enferno

DJ ENFERNO

Fall 2012
(As seen in PMc Magazine, October 2012)     

1: How do we know you?
You’ve probably seen me on Madonna‘s 2008 Sticky & Sweet Tour, or you have seen my live remix videos on Youtube or heard my work on iTunes. In any case, nice to meet you!

2: What is your latest project?
I’m about to release my first original track alongside Mickey Fortune called “Cavaricci” and I also just finished an official remix for the Linkin Park song “Powerless.” Both will be available soon!

3: Where are you living?
Fairfax, VA. It is near Washington, DC. The suburbs are my sanctuary.

4: What don’t we know about you?
I once jumped out of a plane voluntarily.

5: What is your favorite travel destination?
Secluded beach trips with my family.

6: What inspires you?
Those moments when I feel like I’ve experienced something for the very first time.

7: If not yourself, who would you be?
Thomas Edison. Although it’s never too late for that.

8: What book is your bible?
The dictionary.

9: What is your favorite word?
Unlimited.

10: Who is your biggest hero?
My wife. She is Superwoman. Literally, she has a cape, spandex, and wristbands.

11: How would you define success?
Success is when you feel happy without having to do anything. If you wake up in the morning and you are happy, then I believe you are successful.

12: What would the last question of this questionnaire be if you were the one asking?
How can we find out more about you? Glad you asked, you can find out all about me at: DjEnferno.com, Facebook.com/DjEnfernoFanpage, and Twitter.com/DjEnferno.

Enferno is a DMC USA Champion (2nd in the World), and a certified gold remixer for LMFAO who has recently been named #1 on Billboard’s Next Big Sound chart. He is also the creator of the next progression of live DJ performance called the Live Remix Project (LRP). Enferno was Madonna’s 2008-2009 Sticky & Sweet World Tour DJ, as well as the DJ and programmer for Michael Jackson’s The Immortal World Tour and Rihanna’s Loud Tour. Today, Enferno is busy balancing studio time with jets-setting around the world for his own tour.

LINKS:
Dj Enferno

Facebook Page

Soundcloud
Twitter: djenferno
Youtube.com/djenferno

Questions by PMc Magazine
Edited by Ceara Maria Burns

Photography by Douglas Sonders Photography
Design by Jillian Mercado

Captions:
Eric aka DJ Enferno, Photography by Douglas Sonders Photography

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

CONTROLLING THE MOMENT: A Glimpse into the Life and Work of Photographer NANCY ELLISON



CONTROLLING THE MOMENT

A Glimpse into the Life and Work of Photographer NANCY ELLISON
By Jonathan Metzelaar
Fall 2012
(As seen in PMc Magazine, October 2012)    



Photography is so pervasive these days that it’s remarkable how personal of a medium it still is. Almost everybody on the street has access to a camera now, whether it’s a point-and-shoot, a professional piece of equipment, or just a cellphone camera. Factor in wildly popular photography websites like Flickr and Instagram, and it’s clear that photography is being done pretty much everywhere, by pretty much everybody.

And yet each photograph is still unique, still comes out branded, in just the slightest way, by how the photographer sees the world. You tell twenty people to all take a picture of the same building, and you get twenty different shots, twenty different interpretations of how people feel an object is best represented. There is something of the photographer inside each photograph.

This is especially true of the professionals. One glance at a photograph by Ansel Adams or Annie Leibovitz and, without any other clue or indication, you just know who took that picture. It is ingrained in the colors, the subjects, the focus, the style.

Photographer Nancy Ellison is no exception. Her theater and dance photographs capture the beauty of movement, hold it still for us to marvel at. And her portraits are intensely personal, each capturing the subject in what seems like a moment of contemplation or reprieve, each giving the viewer a rare glimpse into what seems like a person in his or her natural state. Despite the wide range of subjects and categories her photography deals with, there is a unique thread to Nancy’s work that ties it all together, that makes  a person automatically think, after they see a photograph of hers, “Now that’s a Nancy Ellison.”

Jonathan Metzelaar: You grew up in Los Angeles, in pretty close proximity to Hollywood and the movie-making process. How much of an impact did growing up there have on your eventual interest in photography and producing? What did you see growing up that made you realize this is what you wanted to do?

Nancy Ellison: Most importantly I saw celebrities–often out-of-work celebrities–in daily life.  I saw the effects of the Hollywood blacklist on the lives of school friends.  I was witness to the complete reality of celebrity.  My awe was slowly replaced by sympathy.

I trained as a painter and art historian, and that clearly influenced my sense of aesthetics. But shooting on movie sets lured me back to my “Hollywood” childhood, and it was enticing.  Aesthetically, my Hollywood influence would have been similar to anyone who saw films.  I loved Hollywood Art Deco–George Hurrell’s Jean Harlow reclining in a bias-cut white evening dress on a polar bear rug comes to mind–and I loved the lighting used in black and white films.  It is worth studying.  The great lighting cameramen lit men and women quite differently; women were lit in glowing but selective lighting, literally blocking out anything that did not play to their eyes and to their mouths, while men were given the craggy shadows that brought out their masculinity.  Black and white film gave drama and focus to even the slightest frame.

It was fun visiting movie sets as a child. I loved that secret, magical world in which the “adults” got to play, and I still do. Working on somewhere around seventy films as a “special photographer” has given me a superb education on lighting.  Watching the best cinematographers, like Connie Hall,  Vilmos Zsigmond, and Haskell Wexler, light a set and their stars was my ‘graduate school’.
As for producing,  I just enjoy being part of any creative process.  Producing “America’s Voices” in Berlin back in 2000, with my husband, Bill Rollnick, was an honor and an opportunity to be a representative of our country while having a lot of fun doing it.

JM: What would you say was your first big break, and how did it come about?

NE: During the filming of The Day of the Locust, I became friends with Mary Ellen Mark.  At that time I was known primarily on the east coast–and exclusively as a painter–but she graciously posed for me. One of those photographs was used as her portrait in the book Masters of Contemporary Photography.  Not only did she gift me with that inclusion, she helped me with my portfolio and gave me advice about photo editors.  Quite honestly, I did not realize at the time just how unique her generosity actually was. I have since found that most photographers–with a few wondrous exceptions–react to someone starting out in the same photo-world with either suspicious indifference or behavior bordering on actual sabotage.  I have tried to follow her example.

JM: I thought it was interesting that photography and dance seemed to be your two main areas of interest, since dance is an art concerned with movement, and photography seems to be just the opposite. How did you come about being interested in these two areas of art, considering how different they seem on the surface?

NE: Well, to begin with, photographing young, beautiful, and disciplined dancers is simply a treat, and classical ballet has created a world equal to that reality. Just showing up will give one breathtaking images.  But stopping the dancer’s movement, catching the timeless and gravity-free moment of a jump, or defining harmony with a perfectly balanced arabesque, is splendor–spiritual in every way. The conceit of the photographer is sustained in conquering movement and making it still.

JM: You’ve photographed a wide range of people, from dancers to writers to politicians. Is there a particular group of people you enjoy photographing more than others?


NE: Starlets, presidents… kinda similar.  Everyone I shoot wants to be loved and admired. The vainest man I photographed was Boris Yeltsin, who was quite infatuated with his pompadour hairstyle; surrounding my lens with a mirror guaranteed that I would get a perfect expression from him.

I am generally sympathetic and pretty patient with eccentric behavior, and I love shooting interesting people, but I do have a problem with overblown self-importance, and that certainly transcends any single group of celebrity.  So it is not so much the group but the individual. I have to love, at least for the moment, the subject I am photographing, but if someone is behaving like a brat, I simply walk away.

By the way, the person who is actually important and powerful usually isn’t inclined to act self-important. They intuitively understand the symbiotic reality of the photo session.

JM: What goes through your mind when you’re photographing your subjects? Are you interested mainly in capturing an image that’s aesthetically pleasing? Are you trying to tell a story? Are you trying to capture the essence of whoever or whatever you’re shooting? Some combination thereof?

NE: Yes, all of the above–most of the time. For example, my session with concert pianist Lola Astanova became a spy novel.  Every shot I took of her had a covert, seductive energy to it, but that is what I saw in her private beauty.   If you think of photographers like Annie Leibovitz or Helmet Newton, the first thing that comes to mind would be their iconic branding of their style, which consistently overlays their subject. Very powerful images.  My curiosity about my subject dictates a more intrinsic image, which means the subject often defines the style.  Occasionally I achieve an iconic image and I am thrilled, but ultimately I am more interested in seeing one of my portraits and thinking, ‘there is something learned’. I love beauty, and I love finding a primordial sexuality in my subjects, but neither of these elements should overlay the essential reality in front of me.

JM: I’d imagine that growing up around so many celebrities would make you immune to it, but was there ever a photo shoot where you were starstruck by your subject? If so, did it make it any more difficult for you to do your job?

NE: Not starstruck, but I have been struck on occasion by the moment.  When I was photographing the extremely distracted Nazi-hunter, Simon Wiesenthal, on assignment for US News & World Report, I had a major shy-attack, feeling that I was taking up his time. I became more focused on releasing him than getting his attention and finding some insight into him.   The results were professional but unfulfilled.  A photographer has to control the moment–even if it is only in his own mind!

JM: I know this must be a difficult question to answer, considering how prolific you are, but what photograph (or handful of photographs) are you most proud of and why?

NE: Not difficult at all. The photographs that I am the most proud of are the ones I took when I gave birth to my daughter. After twenty hours of labor, I became re-energized when my doctor made a bet with the nurses that I would succeed, and I managed about five images of her crowning before the doctor suggested he get on with business.  The crowning image was like an Imogen Cunningham or Georgia O’Keefe magnolia blossom–breathtakingly beautiful, organic, and caressed by joy.

JM: Do you have any upcoming projects you’d like people to know about?

NE: I am preparing for a retrospective exhibition of my work that will open at the Pacific Design Center, aka The Blue Whale, in West Hollywood this coming March, 2013.  At last I am organizing my archival work.


Nancy Ellison is an acclaimed photographer and producer.

LINKS:
Nancy Ellison’s Official Website

Written and Edited by Jonathan Metzelaar
Photograph (Page 1/Cover) by Bill Rollnick

Photography (Page 2 & 3) by & Courtesy of Nancy Ellison
Design by Marie Havens

Captions:

Page 1/Cover:
Photograph (Page 1/Cover) by Bill Rollnick
Page 2:
Mick Jagger, Photography (Page 2 & 3) by & Courtesy of Nancy Ellison
Page 3:
Pierce Brosnan, Photography (Page 2 & 3) by & Courtesy of Nancy Ellison

[ADDITIONAL PHOTOS] TOO GOOD TO IGNORE: A Conversation with Rock Stars TOMMY LONDON and TOMMY MOKAS of THE DIRTY PEARLS






TOO GOOD TO IGNORE

A Conversation with Rock Stars TOMMY LONDON and TOMMY MOKAS of THE DIRTY PEARLS

By Jonathan Metzelaar
Fall 2012
(As seen in PMc Magazine, October 2012)    
--

Written and Edited by Jonathan Metzelaar

Photography by Coco Alexander

Design by Marie Havens

Captions:
Pages 1-7:
The Dirty Pearls in NYC, 2012, Photography by Coco Alexander


TOO GOOD TO IGNORE: A Conversation with Rock Stars TOMMY LONDON and TOMMY MOKAS of THE DIRTY PEARLS

TOO GOOD TO IGNORE

A Conversation with Rock Stars TOMMY LONDON and TOMMY MOKAS of THE DIRTY PEARLS

By Jonathan Metzelaar
Fall 2012
(As seen in PMc Magazine, October 2012)     

If you want to make a name for yourself as a musician in New York, you need more than just musical talent. It sounds trite, but for people to take notice of you or your band, you’ve got to have that little something extra, that one thing that pushes you above the sheer volume of talent out there. When you look to some of the musical acts that made it in New York, more often than not you can see that distinguishing characteristic. Bob Dylan had the inimitable falsetto and the generation-defining lyrics. KISS had the face paint and the personality. The Strokes had the attitude and the charisma. Here it is not enough to simply be good; you have to be exceptional.

Enter The Dirty Pearls, a New York-based band with the attitude and the stage presence that rock and roll has been sorely lacking for a while now. Watching them perform live, you can sense them feeding off the enthusiasm of the crowd and channeling it into their music. These guys pretty clearly love doing what they do, and they’ve got the musical chops to back up their enthusiasm. Their brand of rock is gruff and manic, but instrumentally tight, a sound that is quintessentially New York. With their first full-length album, Whether You Like It Or Not, having just been released, and a potential cross-country tour on the horizon, these guys have been very busy, but lead singer Tommy London and guitarist Tommy Mokas still found the time to sit down and answer a few questions.

Jonathan Metzelaar: How do you view the New York music scene right now compared to other cities? How do the audiences, venues, and musical talent compare? What are some of your favorite New York-based bands and venues, and why?

Tommy Mokas: I think the New York scene is very volatile in terms of its perceived popularity, but always very vibrant in terms of the participation of the musicians themselves.  It may go without saying, but New York City is probably the most difficult place in the country to be a successful, functioning unit.  Every single factor about existing is against you, but I firmly believe this is what makes it exciting as well.  Being a band in New York has changed significantly these past twelve years in terms of the scope of requirements for both the individual and the band, but what hasn’t changed is the amount of crazy you have to be to even try.  I think it’s a bold statement to even be a band in this city at all.  There is a vast amount of talent here, and because the pool is so vast, sometimes your “average” band doesn’t get very far here, when it would likely succeed in another place due to less competition.  Other cities have the advantage of being cheaper, easier to get more space, easier to have a vehicle, etc. But none of those other places are New York.  If it wasn’t such a drug, there wouldn’t be 8 million people trying to be here!

Venues in New York have gotten better over the years, but I think the more venues we have, the less of a scene there is. It’s been quite a while since a scene was centralized around a couple of key spots.  I personally believe this makes it harder for a scene to grow.  In other cities, you only have a few choice spots to frequent if you want to see live music, let alone good music.  In New York, you have the choice of hundreds of venues on any given evening, and you rely largely on word of mouth as to where you’re going to go to enjoy yourself.  You could go out to a venue, really enjoy it, and never go back there again before it closes up for good.

The last place that I feel had a really rabid and vibrant scene in New York rock was Snitch. The stage was shitty and narrow, there were barely any stage monitors, and it had a crappy sound system, but fuck, the crowds!  The Monday night party was the place to be, because you could step on that stage and rock a full room. Even if nobody knew you, they gave you a chance just for having the courage to try. That was the last time I felt that sort of energy from a venue and a scene.
As for NYC-based bands, there have been a lot of good ones in recent years, and the range covers it all: The Strokes, LCD Soundsystem, The Walkmen, Ryan Adams, Yeasayer, Grizzly Bear, Vampire Weekend, Holy Ghost… I mean it’s all over the place.

Tommy London:  Yeah, there are a lot of great bands on the NYC music scene right now. It reminds me of when I read about the NYC rock scene from the 70′s, where all these bands were different in their own way, yet they still shared a core audience and were part of the same scene.  You had The Ramones, Blondie, The Talking Heads, New York Dolls, and many more all coming from a different place, but still part of of the same scene.  I feel that is the strength of the downtown rock music scene at the moment.  It’s not like a Seattle scene or hair band scene, where all the bands were cut from the same cloth.  Don’t get me wrong, I’m not knocking those bands. I purchased all their music and still love it today.  I’m just saying that the rock scene in New York has always been an eclectic one, and it still is.  Though I think it’s more of a “community” than it is a “scene”.  We have a strong community of rock music enthusiasts who just live and breathe rock ‘n’ roll.  That’s what its all about–keeping the spirit alive.

And whenever we play out of town we always discover that small community of rockers, just like in NYC.  They are just as passionate about rock ‘n’ roll as us and our friends in NYC.  It’s pretty amazing.  Sometimes I feel as if they are seeking that larger community of people that they can relate to, and when I sense that I always tell them they need to come to the the city for a week and experience the bars, parties, and venues that cater to their taste.  Then they will see why New York City truly is a drug.

As for venues, we’ve played most of them in New York, like Irving Plaza, Gramercy Theatre, Bowery Ballroom, etc.  They all have their own history, which makes them special to play.  But I have to say the one that really did it for me was when we first headlined the Bowery Ballroom.  That was our first venture into a large venue.  On the NYC rock club scene, the Bowery Ballroom has always been considered the “Madison Square Garden” of the scene.  They never booked bands from the rock scene.  So when we landed our first headline show there, it not only represented the fact that The Dirty Pearls had arrived, but it also gave a lot of attention to the scene that we came from.

JM: You’re new album, Whether You Like It Or Not, was just released.  In what ways would you say this album is different from the music you made prior, and which songs do each of you guys enjoy playing the most on the album?

TM: When I joined the band, I had every intention of making it a decidedly more hard-hitting band, but expanding on the pop sensibility.  In my previous band, Nova Clutch, I was influenced by a lot of heavier and more progressive bands like Muse, The Mars Volta, and Soundgarden, but I was always rooted in bands like Aerosmith, Guns n’ Roses, and The Clash.  Playing with The Pearls made me get back to my roots and start thinking in a simpler, more straightforward way about songwriting.  I think the songs which best portray that spread of influence would be “Who’s Coming Back To Who” and “Mayday”.  Those also happen to be my favorite to play live.

TL: Yeah I have to be honest, when Mokas and I got together and started writing, the band started shifting in a different direction–in a good way! The songs I wrote in other bands before The Dirty Pearls were cut-and-dry, fun rock tunes. But when I got together with Tommy Mokas the songs took on a whole different life of their own.  To be honest it was pretty magical.  We pounded out a bunch of killer rock/pop songs with strong hooks, melodies, lyrics, and riffs.  Then when Sunny Climbs joined the band we hit the songwriting trifecta.  I’m looking forward to the three of us writing some new songs.

As for performing live, my favorite songs to perform live are “Who’s Coming Back To Who,” “Sucker For A Sequel,” and “New York City Is A Drug”.  There is just an energy behind them live that makes me want to jump into the audience and put my fists in the air with them.
JM: How do the songs you guys write typically come together? Is each band member responsible for coming up with their own part, or does one of you kind of give the others direction? And is Tommy generally in charge of lyrics since he’s the one who has to sing them, or is it more of a collaborative effort?

TM: Because I’ve been a recording studio owner since 2003, I can safely say I’ve forced my influence on the parts in the songs that I’ve helped write.  I would generally demo out the songs in my studio, playing all the parts and getting the ideas out of my head.  But in the hands of the other members, they have been allowed to come alive.  This became even more true under the direction and wisdom of Mr. David Kahne, who took our piece of granite and chiseled a nice group of songs from it.  His ear and ability to edit tightened the songs even more, both musically and arrangement-wise, and the songs are better for it.  Lyrically, London and I work out the initial ideas together, but I’ve always allowed him the space to sing whatever he’s gonna sing.  I know from years as a singer, you have to believe what you’re singing, so I tend to be slightly hands-off in that respect.  But I give my input when I feel it’s needed or helpful.

TL: A lot of the songs actually start with a chorus melody and chord structure, and then we build around it and see where it leads.  But as Mokas said, it was our producer Daivd Kahne, who has worked with Sublime, The Strokes, and Paul McCartney, that really helped mold the clay and make our songs just pop even more. After we get the initial demo down with melody and structure, we take it to the band so they can help develop it even more, and that’s when the song starts to come to life.  That’s actually the best feeling in the world; coming up with an idea with a guitar and a vocal, getting the band involved, and then starting to feel it come to life.  The icing on the cake, of course, is when you perform it in front of an audience to see their reaction.  It’s amazing, I can’t even describe it.

JM: The illegal downloading of music has been a pretty big issue in the music industry for awhile now. As a band trying to make a name for itself, I’d imagine it’s pretty frustrating to lose out on some of the profits you could make in music sales, yet some musicians look at the silver lining and say it’s okay as long as their music is getting out there. Where do you guys stand on this issue?

TM: As the owner of a studio, and a lifelong musician, I say stop whining.  It’s over.  It’s been devalued, and it ain’t ever going back to the way it was.  Figure out new ways.  Its called the music business.  It always changes, and it always will.  It isn’t profitable to sell typewriters anymore, but people still write, don’t they?  Someone made money when the trends changed, and it wasn’t cause they lamented the death of the typed word on paper. If you want to be financially successful in music, which, for the record, is not a God-given right, then you have to be an enterprising individual.  If you want to be a musician, make music.  They are two separate things to me.  I treat them as such.  You think Hendrix was thinking about how to market “Foxy Lady”?  No, he was too busy being Hendrix.  As Steve Martin said, “Be so good they can’t ignore you.”  That is how I believe you have to be to win.  Oh, and have a good manager!

TL: I think Mokas just said it all!  I mean the internet became a double-edged sword for a lot of things, not just music.  But let’s be honest, an unsigned band like us have the opportunity to be seen and heard all over the world by just the touch of a button.  That’s pretty amazing and special if you ask me.  You have to learn to market your music as a way to sell your live shows and merchandise.  Plus, there are many other avenues to make money with your music besides downloads.  Commercials, TV, and movies are still profitable venues for you to make money with your music.

JM: The Dirty Pearls have a very distinctive sound, kind of a gruff-yet-polished rock and roll. Have you guys ever felt confined by that? Were there ever any songs you wanted to include on an album that you had to exclude because they didn’t really fit? And do you envision yourselves experimenting with new things on future records, or are you guys devoted to the sound you’ve got?

TM: Personally, I’m making all different kinds of music all the time.  I’m a composer, it’s what I’ve been doing since I was 13.  So for me, The Pearls is an outlet for making the kind of music that I really love, that I might not make to this extent on my own.  I don’t think it would be wise to say we’re devoted to the sound we’ve got, but I’d say we’re devoted to the feeling we’re trying to create.  I’ve seen how crowds react to us when we hit them over the head with a set, and that’s an energy I want to expand on.

TL: We never felt confined at all to be honest.  We did have a few songs that we recorded for this album that just didn’t blend with the songs on the album as a whole.  But that’s not to say we won’t be performing them live, or that we won’t consider them for the next album, or even that we won’t release them as an individual single online.  We have a few demos we’ve written that are experimental in sound and groove that will definitely show our growth as writers and musicians, which we will showcase on the next album for sure.  But at the end of the day, it will always be rock ‘n’ roll.

JM: What upcoming events or projects are you working on that you’d like people to know about?

TM: I’ll let you answer this one, London.

TL: We just released our first full-length album, Whether You Like It Or Not, which at the moment is only available through our website, but you can also purchase some of the singles from the album on iTunes.  We have generated a lot of major interest with the album, and that’s why we haven’t released it fully on digital outlets… yet.  We’re playing regional dates in support of the album with some national acts, as well as our own headline shows.  We are lining up a big NYC headline show for the end of the year, and we’re hoping to take the band cross-country soon, especially due to the fact that a lot of radio stations have recently started to spin the songs from the album.

A few of our songs have recently been picked up by the popular video game Tap Tap.  As far as I know, we are the first unsigned band to be included in this game, so it’s a really big deal for us.  Metallica, Lady Gaga, Green Day, and many others are included in the game, so I’d say that’s pretty good company.  We have a lot of other things in the works that involve tour support slots, film, and television, but it’s too premature to discuss them just yet.  But you can always find all the updates on everything that’s happening with us, from tour dates to news, on our facebook, twitter, and of course on our website.

Tommy Mokas and Tommy London are both members of New York-based rock band The Dirty Pearls, whose first full-length album, Whether You Like It Or Not, was just released.

LINKS:
The Dirty Pearls Official Website

Written and Edited by Jonathan Metzelaar

Photography by Coco Alexander

Design by Marie Havens

Captions:
Pages 1-7:
The Dirty Pearls in NYC, 2012, Photography by Coco Alexander

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

ROCK-N-ROLL IN HER DNA: Talking with Rock Goddess BEBE BUELL





ROCK-N-ROLL IN HER DNA

Talking with Rock Goddess BEBE BUELL
By Lori Zimmer
Fall 2012
(As seen in PMc Magazine, October 2012)    

Bebe Buell is one of those people that makes it so you can’t help but smile when you have the luck to be in her company–and I’m not talking about her amazing rock-n-roll making, rock star dating, Liv Tyler parenting, Playboy modeling past. So incredibly grounded and humble, her lust and passion for rock music has made her a rock-n-roll missionary–the exact opposite of the groupie stereotype that the media has consistently pegged her as.

At first, I didn’t even want to mention the word “groupie,” as if its utterance would give it some sort of validation, but it is relevant since Bebe has been accused of being one for much of her life. Contrary to the “groupie” stereotype, Bebe’s life-long obsession has not been with rock stars, but with the music itself, with rock-n-roll. Yet the stigma has stuck, which after only a few moments with her, I found totally infuriating, and unfair. She speaks of her musical experiences with excitement and fervor, inviting others to join her enthusiasm rather than alienating them with elitism. She’s the kind of person you want to be around, first to hear her fascinating stories, but then because she just makes you somehow feel included in them.

Her involvement in rock-n-roll over the last forty-plus years was founded on a deep connection to music–even now she lives and breathes rock-n-roll with every breath. Her relationship with husband Jim Wallerstein is heavily steeped in music, the pair have been steadily making it together for over ten years, partnering in both love and art. The Bebe Buell Band continues to thrive; their latest album, Hard Love, kicked off with a video for the track “Devil You Know.” The track features Bebe’s signature raspy voice fused with powerful rock and an appearance by the Power Animals that climb and claw throughout the vid. The band continues to play the New York area, and headlined the CBGB’s fest at High Line Ballroom this summer.

The face that launched a thousand rock-n-roll ships, Bebe’s influence has helped inspire and shape friends and lovers like Todd Rundgren, Stiv Bators, Steven Tyler, Joey Ramone, Iggy Pop, John Taylor, Rod Stewart, amongst dozens of other rock-n-rollers that her life has touched. Her commitment to rock has been a force in its longevity, glamour and appeal. Rock-n-roll will never die as long as Bebe Buell is at the helm.

Lori Zimmer: You’ve been called a groupie, but anyone that really knows of you knows that even muse is an understatement, that you’re more of a rock-n-roll catalyst. Does this negative connotation of women who influence musicians bother you?
Bebe Buell: It has gone on since the beginning of time. I’ve just chosen to voice my distaste for labeling another person for their personal life experience. I’m more like Forrest Gump with a high IQ than a vixen. I don’t like getting called names period! The term “groupie” is not a job discription–it’s more of a taste description. But sadly it has gotten tarnished by those that drive the pop culture bus. It went from being something kind of cool and innocent to being something focusing on sexual exploits. I’m not very sexual–I’m more cerebral. I have sexual energy as an entertainer, but it comes from the music. I move the way the music makes me feel.

LZ: Being a musician yourself, do you think it is an unfair double standard?
BB: Again, that’s gone on since the beginning of time–but I have never let my sex get in the way of my dreams. I’ve had to work harder, prove myself a little more, but in the end, I am doing what I want to do. I’m the lead singer in a rock band. Double standards will always exist–it’s how you let it affect you that matters.

LZ: I don’t want to dwell too much on the past, but your life and experience with some of the world’s most iconic musicians is hard to entirely gloss over. When looking back, what spurred your heavy involvement in the rock-n-roll scene?
BB: Basically I’ve always just followed my heart, and my heart beats for music–all kinds of music. But rock-n-roll is in my DNA; I have a connection to that kind of music. I’ve kept the bloodline alive with the birth of my rock-n-roll love child. Birds of a feather flock together. In my life, I am ruled by chemistry. I go where I’m comfortable and where I belong. I feel blessed to have known so many talented, interesting people, and to still meet people every day that fascinate and elate me.

LZ: When did you realize that you’d made it beyond the average fan and into the inner circle?
BB: Probably around the same time anyone who comes to NYC at 17/18 years old and is accepted into the inner circle. I felt like I belonged almost instantly after getting here. I imagined all of it, visualized all of it, starting at around 10 years old. When I saw The Beatles on The Ed Sullivan Show, I just knew those were my people, HA! We are rock people!

LZ: Do you remember when you first met Patrick McMullan?
BB: I could never pin down the day because I feel like he has been a constant in my life for the last four decades. He’s one of those people who has been an important part of the entertainment scene in NYC since the 60s. No one like him. I adore the guy!

LZ: How has raising a daughter changed your interaction with the music world / fame monster?
BB: I could never measure it because I was so young when Liv was born. She has always been part of my life and career. She’s in it. And I in her’s. It’s a legacy, a family business at this point. Look at my mother, she’s our matriarch.

LZ: In a world of egos, the impression you give off is a down to earth, breath of fresh air. Taking that ego into consideration for a moment, how have you managed to not only keep it at bay, but to encompass the humble yet confident way of life that you live?
BB: Spiritual practice–keeping myself in check with a higher power. Never letting pain stop you from loving. I try not to give haters power.

LZ: Your new video just debuted earlier this summer–how did you come up with the concept  and working with the Power Animals?
BB: I saw them around NYC and in a clip somewhere. I knew I wanted to have them in there in some capacity. Aren’t they fabulous?!

LZ: You’ve been married to a musician (and collaborator) for the past ten years. Do you work together as a couple in the studio, or do you leave your love out of the workplace?
BB: It becomes second nature. Jim plays in my band, co-writes my music, produces me, helps get the bands together. He’s my musical partner. We have date nights and go on vacations to keep the romance alive, but basically music is our lives. Full-time. All the time.

LZ: You kicked off summer with a show honoring CBGBs, with your new music in tow, can we expect more shows this fall, or a tour?
BB: Touring is costly and of course we want to tour. We are seeking sponsorship as we speak. But we do play regionally and will play in NYC again before the end of 2012. As soon as the new Cutting Room opens, we will be doing a residency there. It’s been a long wait for this state-of-the-art new place, but it will be worth it in the end. The place is gorgeous and the stage is heavenly! Can’t wait to grace it. I’m also working on a one woman show. I will always consider NYC my home, the place I unveil my projects. I can’t wait to do a run here, a weekly thing. That’s what I’m working towards right now…so stay tuned

Bebe Buell is an American fashion model and rock star, not to mention Playboy magazine’s November 1974 Playmate of the Month.

LINKS:
Bebe Buell Band – Official Site

Bebe Buell Band – Twitter

Written by Lori Zimmer
Edited by Tyler Malone
Photography by Jonathan Grassi
Makeup and Hair by Natalia López de Quintana (Twitter/instagram/Tumblr: duchessnatalia)
Style by Delvin Lugo
Stylist Assistance by Rasaan Wyzard
Male Modelling by Dan Morris
Design by Marie Havens


Captions:
Pages 1-5:
Bebe Buell, 3 of Cups Lounge, New York City, July 7, 2012, Photography by Jonathan Grassi

Clothing:

Look 1: (pie)
Jacket by Marc by Marc Jacobs
Blouse by Zara
Fishnet Glove by LaCrasia

Look 2:
Jacket by Calvin Klein
Tshirt by Bess NYC
Pants by Zara
Necklace by Alexis Bittar

Look 3: (on the bar)
Same as above
Pumps by Christian Louboutin

Look 4: (at the door)
Knit Bolero Jacket by Cheng
Pants by Zara